An ‘Opportunity to Fix’ the DOL Rule

The Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, as well as other regulations and laws that affect and govern retirement plans, were part of the discussion at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce meeting on Feb. 3.

“The Shifting Paradigm of Retirement,” a morning program in which speakers from the federal government, private industry and academia discussed topics relevant to retirement plans, took place against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s announcement that it would be issuing an executive order concerning the rule.

“The opportunity to fix a rule that was broken from the get-go is good news,” said David Hirschmann, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness.

Tommy Nguyen, Staff Director of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety, making clear that he spoke for himself only and not in an official capacity on behalf of the subcommittee, remarked the fiduciary rule serves to limit access to advice and said of the morning’s announcement about the rule, “We are encouraged by some of the news that the White House is taking action.”

Tax reform also figured in several of the morning’s presentations.

Regarding whether tax reform would result in retirement savings being treated as a source of government revenue, Stephen Hostelley, Legislative Assistant for Rep. Jim Renacci (R-OH), said that in the process of tax reform there is a need to make sure “that retirement options are not being taken away.” Hostelley was expressing his own views and not speaking on behalf of the congressman. Nguyen agreed, adding, “As we encourage individuals to save, that’s one less dollar or federal aid” they may need.

Others evinced at least some interest in changing tax treatment and the way public policy affects retirement saving and income.

Ashwini Srikantiah, Director of Product Management at Fidelity’s Center for Applied Technology, expressed her view that existing tax incentives regarding employer contributions to retirement plan programs result in an increase in taxable income for employees and provide no tax benefit for employers that make the contributions.

Jen Brown, Academic Fellow at the Tax Policy Center of American University’s Kogod School of Business, in her presentation on the new economy and retirement security, asked why there are many kinds of IRAs. “Why not make it simpler? Why not consolidate?” She also asked why the threshold could not be raised.

And Ted Goldman, Senior Pension Fellow at the American Academy of Actuaries, in discussing longevity and retirement security, cited public policy as one of the ways that the effects of increased longevity can be addressed.

Add Your Comments

One Comment

  1. Connie Stamolis
    Posted February 6, 2017 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Thank goodness for the executive order to review the Fiduciary Regs. As a retirement plan specialist and business owner for 30 + years, those regs solved no problems and would cause MANY small business to terminate their 401(k) plans. Who wants that kind of fiduciary responsibility?? The only ripoff for investments have been front loaded mutual funds which also had high annual fees. Another ripoff was creating a rule that allowed the charging of a 1% annual fee for a money market account. So a small IRA couldn’t get advise and was getting new, substantial fees. Boy! who was winning here!!!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>