Supreme Court: Church-Affiliated Plans Are Exempt from ERISA

There’s strength in numbers, and there are no greater numbers than 8-0 when it comes to the U.S. Supreme Court. That’s how the Court ruled in a decision it handed down June 5 that says that religiously affiliated non-profits’ plans are exempt from ERISA even if they were not originally established by a church.

At issue had been whether ERISA’s church plan exemption applies as long as a pension plan is maintained by an otherwise-qualifying church-affiliated organization, or whether the exemption only applies if a church initially established such a plan. Writing for the majority, Associate Justice Elena Kagan notes, “The question presented here is whether a church must have originally established such a plan for it to so qualify. ERISA, we hold, does not impose that requirement.”

In so ruling, the high court overturned decisions at both the district and appellate level in the 3rd, 7th and 9th circuits, all of which had embraced the notion that ERISA’s “plain text” required that a plan be established by a church, and only by a church, to qualify for the church-plan exemption.

In an effort to obtain ERISA’s protections for their defined benefit plan benefits, the plaintiffs in these cases – current and former hospital employees – had filed class actions alleging that the hospital plans were not entitled to ERISA’s church-plan exemption because they were not established by a church.

The cases consolidated into this decision were Dignity Health v. Rollins, Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton and Saint Peter’s Healthcare System v. Kaplan. On Dec. 2, 2016, the Court granted writs of certiorari on petitions that had been lodged last summer: Advocate Health Care Network, on July 15; Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, on July 18; and Dignity Health on Aug. 29.

Karan notes: “From the beginning, ERISA provided that “[t]he term ‘church plan’ means a plan established and maintained … for its employees … by a church or by a convention or association of churches,” adding, “In 1980, Congress amended the statute to expand that definition by deeming additional plans to fall within it. The amendment specified that for purposes of the church-plan definition, an ‘employee of a church’ would include an employee of a church-affiliated organization (like the hospitals here).” She goes on to say that, “The three federal agencies [the IRS, DOL and PBGC] responsible for administering ERISA have long read those provisions, when taken to­gether, to exempt plans like the hospitals’ from the stat­ute’s mandates.”

“The petitioners identify themselves as three church-affiliated nonprofits that run hospitals and other healthcare facilities, and offer DB pension plans to their employees,” Kagan writes, noting that, “Those plans were established by the hospitals themselves – not by a church – and are managed by internal employee-benefits committees.”

In the opinion, Kagan notes that the courts of appeal all had affirmed district court rulings in the three cases. However, she wrote that these cases were “part of a recent wave of litigation” challenging the approach the IRS, DOL and PBGC had taken to such matters, and that “in light of the importance of the issue, this Court granted certiorari.”

“ERISA provides (1) that a ‘church plan’ means a ‘plan established and maintained … by a church’ and (2) that a ‘plan established and maintained … by a church’ is to ‘include a plan maintained by’ a principal-purpose organization,” Kagan notes, adding, “Under the best reading of the statute, a plan maintained by a principal-purpose organization therefore qualifies as a ‘church plan,’ regardless of who established it. We accordingly reverse the judgments of the Courts of Appeals.”

Add Your Comments

One Comment

  1. J Meeks
    Posted June 6, 2017 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Actually, the vote was 8-0 because Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. See page 15 of the ruling.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>