Nevin (Adams) & Fred (Reish) take their podcasting on the road to Tampa for a live session at the 2022 NAPA 401(k) Summit—and discuss the outcome—and short- and long-term implications—of a recent Supreme Court ruling!
That’s right—as part of last week’s NAPA 401(k) Summit, attendees had a chance to participate live in a special edition of the podcast, where we discussed a recent Supreme Court case with some far-reaching implications—some of which have yet to be fully realized. You won’t want to miss this episode!
Episode Resources (a.k.a. some background reading)
- SCOTUS Gives Excessive Fee Suit Plaintiffs Another Shot: https://www.napa-net.org/news-info/daily-news/scotus-gives-excessive-fee-suit-plaintiffs-another-shot
- Hughes v. Northwestern University et al., case number 19-1401, in the Supreme Court of the United States: https://www.napa-net.org/sites/napa-net.org/files/19-1401_m6io.pdf
- SCOTUS Ponders Excessive Fee Case: https://www.napa-net.org/news-info/daily-news/scotus-ponders-excessive-fee-case
“Extras” (you’ll understand once you’ve listened to the episode)
- Nevin’s column that was cited by the DOL: https://plansponsorinstitute.blogspot.com/2009/02/winning-ways.html
- Nevin’s column about being cited by the DOL (because, why not?): https://plansponsorinstitute.blogspot.com/2009/04/second-opinion.html
- Fred’s article in PLANSPONSOR (edited by Nevin) cited by the Schlichter Bogard & Denton-backed plaintiffs in the original Hughes case (page 23): https://www.napa-net.org/sites/napa-net.org/files/uploads/Divane-v.-Northwestern.pdf
